UNISON City of Edinburgh Branch

 

Home

News

Search

About us

Join Us

Help?

Policy Finder

 

 

UNISON Submission to City of Edinburgh Council Meeting 29 April 2004
Reorganisation of Social Work and Education Services

John Stevenson, Branch Secretary

Thanks for hearing us today. Can I also say that the broad thrust of what we are saying about the issues is shared by the British Association of Social Workers whose representative is also here and with whom we work closely.

UNISON came to the full council on the day the O'Brien Report into the tragic death of Caleb Ness to ask the Council to look at all the issues involved in an atmosphere of 'calm reflection'.

Unfortunately that did not happen and you'll perhaps forgive us if we don't respond this morning with the same 'calm reflection' we have shown throughout this process. Because today our members are angry and I could not stand here in good faith and not reflect the depth of that anger.

Since the O'Brien Report and the council's plans for change, we have been amazed at how a demoralised workforce has reacted. They have seen vacancies double yet they have worked on to deliver a service despite huge caseload pressures and more and more cases that can't be allocated but for which they have continued to accept responsibility.

In Children & Families, they have actively worked to improved systems, improve monitoring and learn what lessons were there to be learned. All this has given extra work and extra pressure at a time when child protection referrals increased and staff resources reduced.

They did all this and got precious little credit - and frankly they did not see their efforts matched in some other agencies.

Criminal Justice staff have also been working on issues raised by O'Brien. This is despite the fact that the restrictive rules the Scottish Executive sets down for Criminal Justice mean they are not resourced to do that. Remember too that youth justice initiatives mean they too work with young people and families. And they too are also working often under intolerable workloads.

Community Care staff are just the same. The important links for special needs children when they progress from Children & Families services at age 16, the work with families where parents have disabilities and the drug related work are all as crucial to care and protection as are Children & Family services.

They put all that work into better combining, co-ordinating and linking their services, then saw the plan was to split them up.

Many of us saw it as 'Back to the Future'. Way back in 1968, the Social Work Scotland Act resulted from the Kilbrandon Report. That report was commissioned to deal with the problems identified everywhere of separate departments all dealing with the same families. At that time it was Childrens Departments, the Probation Service and a range of services for the elderly and disabled. All of these were separate and even where people wanted to co-operate, they were frustrated by separate budgets, separate procedures and separate standards and expectations.

So when our members saw the council's proposal to split them up again, they were dumfounded.

But again, despite their morale being even further dented, they took part in the consultation.

* Not with Strikes.

* Not with overtime bans despite all the extra hours, for many these were extra unpaid hours.

* Not with any of this, but with the 'calm reflection' UNISON had sadly not achieved from the Council.

They responded to the consultation - over 1,000 of them as staff or team members. They responded in detail with alternative suggestions because they knew the job and what needed to change.

They responded via their union. A detailed response analysing the evidence, looking at all the reports and guidance, learning from the research and laying out a 9 point plan to dramatically improve joint working between health, social work, police and education.

But also emphasising the widely evidenced need for better and closer joint working between health and children's social work - the real lessons from inquiries. Not merger, because inquiries don't call for that. They recognise the need for professionals to have their own expertise with their own structures and supports to provide the best service to the public.

Not suprisingly, because all the evidence backs it, detailed responses from the British Association of Social Workers, the Association of Directors of Social Work and a host of other important groups all agreed broadly with us.

Our own senior management agreed with us until an almost miraculous 11th hour conversion.

So, the council consulted, we all took it seriously, we all took lots of time to research the evidence and respond in detail.

And the council ignored it all. The consultation was a sham.

They Scrutiny Panels listened to us and agreed with us broadly - they were ignored too.

Then a new fifth option out was pulled out of the hat. The merger with Housing was dumped and a Health and Social Care Department was revealed. This was never suggested before by the council, it was never consulted upon, the people doing the job in health were not asked about it.

So, for at least that part, there has been no consultation. We are almost thankful because it saved us all the work of responding in detail just to have that ignored too.

I will just sum up the basics as our members see it.

All the inquiries, all the reports, all the evidence recognises that closer working between Children & Families social work, Community Care and Criminal Justice is needed in child protection. - The council plans to split them up.

Children & Families staff, Community Care social workers and occupational therapists, home helps, social care workers, child & family centres, Criminal Justice staff all work with families and with children - but they are to be split up.

All the evidence shows that the key working relationship when it comes to child protection is the link with health services - so the plan is to merge with Education.

All studies show that the age group of children at greatest risk is under 3. So we merge with Education whose responsibility starts at 5 or maybe a wee bit earlier at nursery.

Joint Future initiatives between Social Work and Health, with joint teams reporting back to their own specialist supports, are well developed. So the plan is to cut across that and create a Health and Social Care Department.

Meanwhile, the reality on the ground doesn't change. We don't have enough social workers, we have kids at risk with no social workers and we can't provide the all the support services we need in community care.

Without significant investment, that will not change in any new structure. So the reorganisation won't fix that. In fact all the diverted effort will make it worse.

When we are meant to have 'the eye on the ball' especially in child protection, we are going to spend the next two years dividing up offices, dividing up computer systems, losing the ability to share information, splitting up administrative support and relocating staff - if we don't just lose them altogether.

And while all that is going on, the child protection lessons will have to be learned all over again. New procedures, new working links, new unfamiliar systems. A good deal of the work started before and after O'Brien will have to be started all over again.

So let's be clear. If this reorganisation is a response to the death of a child, all the evidence shows at will make no difference and much suggests it will make things worse.

If it is not a response to O'Brien, it must be part of the Council's 2007 programme.

If it is - and if it is not an emergency response to O'Brien - then what is the hurry? Why can't we take a step back, put things on hold, do the research and at last listen to the people who do the job?

That way you will have a chance of taking them with you. At the moment there is no chance of that. They are angry, they know things can be done better than this and they know they are not being listened to. The worry is that for many of them it will be the last straw and they will just go.

But what should worry us all most of all, is the morale of those who are left.

Lord Laming said that politicians could not escape the responsibility for their actions, for their reorganisations and for their financial decisions when something goes wrong.

As I said earlier, our members have accepted responsibility for unallocated work even though the responsibility lies with the lack of resources and the needless haemorrhaging of staff.

Well, at our meeting the other night the view was very clear. They are no longer prepared to accept that responsibility.

If this does go through today, you have a huge job in getting your staff back onside. Whether that can happen in the short or even medium term is doubtful.

All we can say on behalf of our members is that we will defend them when the absolutely predictable problems arise. And we will back them when they say 'I can't take responsibility for this'.

It is the eleventh hour and it may be an unrealistic demand. But we still hold firmly to the view that this is wrong and you must think again.
 
 

 
 

top