Broken promises of housing sell-offs
Edinburgh Council is spending thousands and thousands of pounds
of YOUR money to convince you to privatise your housing.
They say this is the only way to get rid of their debts and
to improve your housing. But the facts are quite different. Council
tenants in Dundee, Aberdeen and even Prime Minister Tony Blair's
constituency of Sedgefield have all voted 'No' to housing stock
transfer.
In Glasgow they voted 'Yes' but a recent survey shows most tenants
now have no confidence in their new landlord, mainly because of
broken promises like,
- A new rent review after just three years when they were promised
no rises for 10 years.
- More money spent on management that repairs, maintenance and
investment put together
- At £161,000 a year, the boss of the new Housing Association
gets £61,000 more than the council's head of Housing got and
£30,000 more than the First Minister.
The Council will ask you to vote on a 'Business Plan' the size
of a small telephone directory. Most people will not have read
this and those of us that do will struggle to understand the jargon.
But don't let that worry you.
The business plan only matters on day one. After that it can
be changed and in most other stock transfers it has changed, breaking
promises along the way.
The simple fact is that once houses are transferred to the housing
association, THEY CAN NEVER COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL.
Yet the only real information tenants are getting to make this
huge decision is the Council's one-sided glossy campaign materials
urging you to vote 'Yes'. In this bulletin we will give you the
facts the Council is not giving you.
Most Edinburgh tenants admit that they do not know enough information
to make this momentous decision.
That is one of the reason's why UNISON is saying, "If you don't
know, then vote NO".
Back to Headlines
|